Defence ministers from Nato countries are meeting to discuss how to provide Ukraine with more arms and ammunition.
Several member states are supplying Ukraine with weapons including tanks and missile systems to help the country defend itself against Russia.
What is Nato?
Nato – the North Atlantic Treaty Organization – is a defensive military alliance. It was formed in 1949 by 12 countries, including the US, UK, Canada and France.
Members agree to help one another if they come under attack.
The organisation’s original goal was to challenge Russian expansion in Europe after World War Two.
After the Soviet Union’s collapse in 1991, many of the Eastern European countries which used to be Russia’s allies in the Warsaw Pact group were granted Nato membership.
Russia has long argued that Nato’s acceptance of these countries threatens its security. It has vehemently opposed Ukraine’s request to join the alliance, fearing this would encroach too closely on its territory.
How are Nato countries supporting Ukraine?
Many of the alliance’s member states have provided Ukraine with weapons and ammunition.
The US is sending 31 Abrams tanks, the UK 14 Challenger 2 tanks, Germany 14 Leopard 2 tanks and Norway eight Leopard 2 tanks.
The US has also sent armoured fighting vehicles such as the Stryker and the Bradley.
In addition, the US and UK have sent Ukraine long-range missile systems such as Himars and the M142, which have been striking targets behind Russia’s front lines.
Several Nato countries have provided howitzers and self-propelled guns, while Turkey has sold Bayraktar TB2 armed drones.
The US and others have supplied air defence systems such as Patriot and Starstreak to shoot down Russian cruise missiles and drones over Ukraine.
The anti-tank weapons that the US and UK have supplied, such as Javelin and Nlaw, were crucial in turning back Russia’s advance on Ukraine’s capital, Kyiv, in spring 2022.
However, Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg says that Ukraine is currently using ammunition more quickly than member states can supply it.
It is thought that Ukraine is running particularly short of 155mm artillery shells. As a result, the US and UK are asking their domestic manufacturers to increase production.
Why isn’t Nato sending troops to help Ukraine?
Nato countries are not sending troops to Ukraine for fear of provoking a direct conflict with Russia.
They also refused to operate a no-fly zone over Ukraine, for the same reason.
However, since Russia’s invasion, Nato countries have stationed 40,000 troops in eastern Europe – on the territory of alliance members such Lithuania and Poland.
They also have another 300,000 troops on high alert in Europe.
Why isn’t Ukraine in Nato?
Nato told Ukraine in 2008 that it could join the bloc at some point in the future, but declined its recent request for “fast-track” membership.
This is because Article 5 of the Nato charter says that if one member is attacked, all members should come to its defence.
If Ukraine was made a member, Nato countries would technically have to go to war with Russia.
Why do Sweden and Finland want to join Nato?
Finland has a 1,340km (833-mile) land border with Russia, while Sweden faces it across the Baltic Sea.
For seven decades, both thought it safer to be neutral countries rather than join Nato.
But after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, they asked to be given entry to the alliance as soon as possible.
The two countries would add 280,000 troops to Nato’s forces (including reservists), and more than 200 combat aircraft.
All 30 of Nato’s member states have to approve any new member, and 28 countries already have. Only Turkey and Hungary are yet to do so.
Turkey’s government says both Sweden and Finland are harbouring Turkish citizens who it says are “terrorists” and is demanding they be extradited.
Professor Tracey German, an expert in conflict and security at King’s College London, warns it could be dangerous if Turkey and Hungary continue to block for Finland and Sweden’s membership:
“Keeping [them] in this grey zone, where they have no defence from Nato’s collective security guarantees, is putting them in an awkward situation,” she says.
“They might be vulnerable to Russian pressure or interference.”
Source : BBC